Exit Tax – A Comment on Richardson / Zelinsky Debate on Citizenship Based Taxation

Recently, a debate took place on the merits of the United States’ income tax regime which is based on “citizenship”.  This lively debate was between the esteemed John Richardson (a US and Canadian attorney) and Professor Edward Zelinsky (a tax scholar and professor at Cardozo Law School in New York City).  You can watch the full debate by accessing the video embedded at the end of this blog post.

While there were many areas in this animated discussion that could be the subject of various blog posts, I have chosen to address Prof. Zelinsky’s comment on the so-called “Exit Tax” (At Minute 47.56).

Americans Abroad – “Doing Rather Well”?

Essentially, from what I can deduce overall, Prof. Zelinsky seems to be saying that the citizenship-based taxation model is justified and that Americans abroad are doing “rather well”, in part, because of the benefits conferred on them by certain provisions in the US Internal Revenue Code.  As examples, he highlights Section 911 (Foreign Earned Income Exclusion) and Section 877A (expatriation regime).

Specifically, with respect to the expatriation rules, he points to the provision permitting “covered expatriates” an exclusion of USD725,000 on capital gains taxation upon their “exit” from America and its US tax system. Prof. Zelinsky states that he must pay capital gains tax when he earns $1.00 of capital gain, yet the individual who is expatriating and who qualifies as a “covered expatriate” can get an exclusion for USD725,000 of capital gain before the Exit Tax is calculated.

Fake, Fake, Fake

Throughout the debate, John Richardson repeatedly called attention to the general problem of what he calls “fake income” – Subpart F, PFIC, Exit Tax.  Today, I choose to focus on the Exit Tax issue raised in the debate.

Exit Tax – Fake Income, but a Real Tax

I think there is a significant point that should be made. Unlike Prof. Zelinsky, who must generally make a conscious choice to dispose of his assets and who must sell or exchange them before capital gains tax is incurred, the “covered expatriate” will become liable for the tax even though he is not disposing of any assets whatsoever. The “covered expatriate” has not made a choice to sell anything.  For him, tax liability on capital gains arises at expatriation on account of a “deemed” or “pretend” sale or other dispostion of his worldwide assets. The gain is only a phantom one.

Thus, while Prof. Zelinsky will have received cash or something of value before capital gains tax is incurred, the “covered expatriate” has received nothing and will probably lack the cash with which to pay the tax.

Now, Prof. Zelinsky may possibly retort that the Internal Revenue Code in all its wisdom, has a “fix” for this particular problem of illiquidity. The “fix” is in the form of the provision permitting “deferral” of the Exit Tax. A follow-up blog post coming soon will address that fix, and will demonstrate that it is so cumbersome, it is not a realistic “fix” at all!

Foreign Pension Plan

What makes matters particularly worse for the “covered expatriate” having an interest in a foreign pension plan, is that he is deemed to receive the full value of that pension at expatriation. This number is a calculation based on actuarial principles/life expectancy.  He must include that full value in income and immediately pay tax on it.  Significantly, this “pretend” income is not eligible for the $725,000 exclusion.  Again, the expatriate has received nothing from his pension plan and in fact, he may not be eligible to receive his pension for many years after his actual expatriation. Yet the tax is due.

Justifiable in Theory

Prof. Zelinsky did point out in his debate with Mr. Richardson that reform may be needed in some areas where the US tax law is too complex for Americans abroad. This included the foreign pension problem mentioned before.  However, Prof. Zelinsky did not see the US citizenship-based tax model as one that was unjustified, at least not in theory.

For those of you who do not live in an ivory tower, what do you think?  Comments can be seen by scrolling down well to the end of the page.

Posted June 3, 2019


All the US tax information you need, every week –

Just follow me on Twitter @VLJeker (listed in Forbes, Top 100 Must-Follow Tax Twitter Accounts 2017-2019).

Subscribe to Virginia – US Tax Talk  to receive my weekly US tax blog posts in your inbox.

Visit my earlier US tax blog “Let’s Talk About US Tax” hosted by AngloInfo since 2011, it contains all my old posts. Some hyperlinks to my blog posts on AngloInfo may have expired.  If you copy the expired URL, you can most likely retrieve the actual post by using the “Wayback Machine” which is an archiving service.  Simply paste the URL into the Wayback Machine search box. It will show you the archived post was saved on a specific date. Click on that date to retrieve the post.


6 thoughts on “Exit Tax – A Comment on Richardson / Zelinsky Debate on Citizenship Based Taxation

  1. Why did these people keep their American Passports!?!

    Wow – just wow :-/

    I’ve lived and worked for over 35 years in one of the highest taxed countries in world, and it wasn’t until 1998 that I even heard that I was supposed to file U.S. tax forms. A fellow expat showed me how to claim the earned income exclusion which I have done ever since, but now that retirement is pending and my income will be less than half of what it is now, I learned to my horror that moving forward I will have to file using the tax credit, which I don’t know how to do.

    A hard-to-find qualified overseas tax preparer will cost me about $400 each year, even though I won’t owe any U.S. tax! Adding insult to injury was my inability to take advantage of a 401k since excluded earned income doesn’t qualify, plus all the rejections I have had to deal with because of my Expat American status whenever I tried to open a bank or brokerage account in the U.S. or overseas.

    If ignorance of the law is no excuse then I guess the reason I kept my U.S. passport must be sheer stupidity 😦


    1. $400 is just so very cheap… I have not heard of this low a price and to be honest, I am worried about the quality of the returns! FYI, I don’t prepare returns so I have no vested interest. For overseas returns, the cost for a simple tax return is running approximately US$ 1000++.


      1. The $400 quote was from here- https://1040abroad.com/services/#federal-tax-return-preparation-and-filing

        I’ve never used this service so I can’t say anything about the quality of their work one way or the other.

        Anyway I don’t intend to let it go that far. Government overreach has steadily increased over the past 35 years, and if H.R.7358 does not pass then we have reached the point of no return where I surely will renounce before I retire.

        Not because I left America, but because America has left me.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.